LATENT HERESY, APOSTASY AND VATICAN II
11/06/09 11:17
How can
Vatican II, an official Council of the Catholic
Church and the “Novus Ordo Missae”, created by the
Council’s Pope Paul VI, lead millions and millions of
souls to perdition? It can do this insofar as it has
fulfilled what St. Paul warned against so pointedly,
succumbing to a time of “itching ears” or a time of
new teaching which St. John also advised against so
clearly in his First Letter: “Those things have I
written to you concerning those that seduce you: and
as for you, let the unction which you have received
from Him, abide in you. And you have no need that any
man teach you; but as this unction teacheth you of
all things, and is truth, and is no lie.” (1 Jn 2:
27)
>
> Or as St. Paul likewise delineates on the truth: “Avoid the profane novelties of words and oppositions of knowledge falsely so called, which some promising, have erred concerning the faith.” (1Tim: 20-1) In no uncertain terms St. Paul is warning the flock against heretics and their fallacious new teaching.
>
> These novelties, which are abominable new teachings and instructions on the faith for “itching ears”, are at the heart of the confusion of modernism and the unprecedented error promulgated by the Second Vatican Council, this so-called great council of the Church. Latently heretical, and clandestinely perfidious was Vatican II in failing to promulgate the perennial magisterium of the Catholic faith through the centuries by rethinking it, by rephrasing it, and by “reformulating the truth positively” as the Catholic Catechism states erroneously on several doctrinal truths. That being said, lo and behold we have the heretical documents and teachings of this so-called holy Church council militating often against the perennial magisterium of the Catholic faith established through the centuries, creating a most insidious dereliction of Catholic truth.
>
> While there are several new teachings or novelties of Vatican II for “itching ears”, which invite error, confusion, and heresy, none more egregiously does this than “Lumen Gentium” and its rethinking of “outside the Church there is no salvation.” This one instance of “new thinking or new teaching of Tradition was so catastrophic that it alone brought down the defensive walls of Rome that had formerly been intact for centuries. Tradition is not ‘new teaching’ nor as St. Paul says can it be construed as “novelty.” This would be a contradiction of traditional Church teachings by failing to state the truth authoritatively and unambiguously, but instead rethinking it, making Vatican II stand out as the one and only Council of the twenty-three Church Councils since the inception of Christianity to have caused heresy to spread and to reign in the hearts of the faithful, instead of fighting, opposing, and exposing it vigorously as every other Church Council had done from Nicea onward. This is the major heresy of Vatican II for having diminished, watered down, and lessened this most significant of all doctrinal statements of the Roman Catholic Church through the centuries that “outside the Church there is no salvation.”
>
> Not stating vociferously this ultimate truth and reevaluating it less emphatically caused several other covert heresies to rear their ugly heads all over again. How, one may ask? Through satanical double speak and making vice seem like virtue and virtue like vice, the darkness of past error and heretical teachings once more surfaced in the church in such a volatile way that a conglomeration of false theology broke through the formerly impregnable walls of Rome’s Eternal City via a Trojan horse of modernism, the coming together of all heresies in this final attack upon God’s Holy Church before the Tribulation and End Times commence. Here is the train of heretical teachings rising from the corpse of “outside the Church there is no salvation” that has resulted from this one most heretical and sinister council of the Catholic faith, that purposely mis-taught “outside the Church there is no salvation” :
>
> a.) no need to baptize anymore souls into the one true Church of Roman Catholicism.
>
> b.) no need for the sacraments to be saved, especially the sacrament of Penance for the
>
> forgiveness of sins.
>
> c.) no need for the Eucharist and the infinite graces it affords for salvation.
>
> d.) religions “outside the Church” need not convert and, therefore, no longer exclusively require the signal graces from Christ’s Mystical Body, the Church, to be saved all because the Second Vatican Council denied the sufficiency of grace given by Almighty God to every soul for its salvation by teaching “outside the Church there is salvation.”
>
>
>
> One cannot rethink sacred tradition or “restate it positively” in some new way less forcefully or clearly we have a denial of the important truths of the Catholic faith. Such was the case in “Lumen Gentium” which takes exception to the perennial magisterium of the centuries that taught absolutely and irrevocably from the Council of Florence that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church. It states so unequivocally with the following:
>
>
>
> Pope Eugene IV solemnly pronounced, “that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics (Protestants) and schismatics, can have a share in life eternal; but that they will go into the eternal fire, ‘which was prepared for the devil and his angels,’ unless before death they are joined with her; and that so important is the unity of this ecclesiastical body that only those remaining within this unity can profit by the Sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, their Almsgiving, their other works of Christian piety, and the duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the name of Christ, can be saved, unless he remain within the bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church.”
>
>
>
> Herein lies the clash of Vatican II and its decree of “Lumen Gentium” with the perennial magisterium of the ages as taught in the Council of Florence and Pope Eugene IV’s infallible statement above that one must, must “remain within the bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church” in order to be saved when Vatican II stated the following from #846 from the Catholic Catechism and its heretical exception that “those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience–those too may achieve eternal salvation.”
>
> When Florence demands physical unity that ‘one must remain within the bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church to be saved, how can Vatican II justify itself as a legitimate Church Council when it makes such a heretical exception to Florence by suggesting the following subsequent heresies from this false exception:
>
> a. “ That through no fault of their own, one does not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church.” How can this be when the Church has preached through the centuries to the most primitive peoples the Gospel. And with modern communications no one can within reason be ignorant of the gospel of Jesus Christ unto salvation! Since Florence made no exception to the necessity of ‘physical unity’; therefore, all disunity is culpable in light of God’s graces, sufficiently given to save every soul that cooperates with them to find and enter the Church.
>
> b. “But who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do His Will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience.” This is a satanical paradox caused by the diabolical disorientation of modernism that controlled Vatican II, and which implies herein that someone can be moved by graces from God to remain outside His one true Church ‘sincerely’ and still be saved. This literally mocks God’s graces and the perennial magisterial teaching of the centuries which has taught that God gives to every soul a ‘sufficient amount of grace to be saved’, which graces all would lead anyone of sincere mind and heart to ‘the bosom and unity’ of His one true Church.
>
>
>
> This outrageously heterodox exception to Florence and the perennial magisterium of the centuries was nothing more nor less than an alteration to the infallible teaching of Pope Eugene IV and the Council of Florence in 1441. One, therefore, cannot rethink Sacred Tradition or restate in some new way ‘more positively’ else we clearly have a violation and denial of an important truth of the Catholic faith. What makes the arrogance of Vatican II even more frightening is it had the audacity to deny a doctrine taught and proclaimed by every pope from before Eugene IV and the Council of Florence back through all preceding Christian centuries.
>
> This clever subterfuge of verbal legerdemain by the Council fathers was, indeed a satanic ploy perpetrated by the modernists at the Council. To in any way mitigate the necessity of total unity with the one true Church by actual physical membership in the Catholic Church to be saved diminishes the “ex cathedra” pronouncement of Eugene IV at another Council of the Church in Florence, a doctrinal council, by the way, unlike Vatican II which was only a pastoral council. It was the Council of Florence which infallibly taught "outside the Church there is no salvation."
>
> Moreover, this stubborn unholy delight of Vatican II, which also took heretic satisfaction in calling the many-faceted errors of Protestantism, so replete with a multitude of heresies to this very day as somehow part and parcel of the Roman Catholic Church is simply too much to believe. Consider only a few of these heretical Reformation errors and their utter severity and why this cannot be true – i.e. ‘once–saved always–saved; forgiveness of sin requires no priest or Sacrament of Penance; the Holy Eucharist is merely a symbol; the bible and not the Church is the ‘pillar and foundation of the truth. This capitulation of Vatican II to Protestantism is what ultimately destroyed not only the faith of millions of once faithful Catholics but also destroyed the potential faith of millions of more would-be Protestant converts. All these potential converts might have seen why they must inevitably convert to the one true Church to be saved.. Consequently, they all remain outside of the Church and are led to think by Vatican II and the New Catechism that they are saved in some form of ‘quasi invisible supernatural extra-ecclesial membership of ecumenical modernist rhetoric. In fact, Vatican II and "Lumen Gentium" have done everything to dissuade Catholics from proselytizing such non-believers by encouraging all Catholics to learn non-Catholic doctrines and beliefs, to dialogue with them as if truth could be debated and, most horrendous of all, to even participate in such heretical, schismatic and neo-pagan prayer services.
>
> A thing cannot ‘be’ and ‘not’ be at the same time or one can call Protestants as members of the Catholic Church and not members at the same time i.e. pertinacious heretics. This is the undeniable twisted logic of Satan, that he can be God and yet, in reality, not be God at the very same time! This is the basic principle of false logic and contradiction. In short, a gigantic lie!!!
>
> From this false teaching of Vatican II, attempting to redefine or repackage the ultimate truth of the centuries “outside the Church there is no salvation” came the ‘new Mass’ or the “Novus Ordo Missae” which like the teachings of the Council diminished the power of graces in the work of evangelization and the salvation of souls. ‘Lex credendi est lex orandi.” False teachings and belief in God’s Almighty Graces which lead all souls to His Son’s one true Church cannot yield their precious fruit of salvation of souls if they are denied.
>
> Now the Council denied these efficacious graces of conversion, so necessary for anyone’s salvation, because it denied the absolute necessity of physical unity with the one true Church to be saved. When the Council denied these efficacious graces, it also denied the perennial magisterium of the centuries in Sacred Tradition that always taught “outside the Church there is no salvation.”
>
> Now how did Vatican II deny these efficacious graces? It did so unequivocally by saying physical unity is no longer absolutely necessary to be saved but a quasi-separatist unity is just fine which at the same time diminished the absolute need for one to be united ‘in prayer’ with the Church to be saved. This is the essence of the latent heresy advocated by the Council fathers of Vatican II, that unity can exist ‘ in faith’ but not ‘in prayer’ with other religions in general and Liberal Protestantism in particular. This is all so very visible in Vatican Council II's documents, and in particular "Lumen Gentium." This is an egregious reawakening of a centuries old heresy: ‘outside the Church there is salvation.’
>
> When the Council denied these efficacious graces of absolute physical unity, it also denied the perennial magisterium of the centuries in Sacred Tradition that always taught, in season and out of season, ‘outside the Church there is no salvation.’ This doctrine always required the unity to be compete and total, not only ‘in faith’ but also ‘in prayer’. This doctrine of being united especially with the Church in prayer for salvation was solemnly defined at Florence and again reaffirmed at Trent.
>
> What does this mean but that if one is not united ‘in prayer’ with the one true Church, as he must be ‘in faith and doctrine’ to be saved, then he lacks the necessary graces for eternal salvation. Why is this true?
>
> For two reasons: The first is because all the graces of the sacraments, and especially Penance, which above all is most necessary for forgiveness of sins in the whole world, and the most Holy Eucharist without which one has ‘no life in his soul,’ and the Mass–the most perfect sacrificial prayer to God to increase sanctifying graces in one’s soul are all, woefully, missing graces for those “outside the Church.” All of these sacraments of salvation are only possible to a soul absolutely and totally united physically with the one true Church of Jesus Christ, the Roman Catholic Church. By the same token it is impossible to claim unity ‘in prayer’ with the Church, in order to be saved and receive the necessary graces for salvation , if one is not totally joined to the one true Church both physically and spiritually. Simply graces do not flow like a faucet upon those who do not care or are not present ‘within the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.’
>
> And the second reason is because of the “Novus Ordo Missae” or the New Order of the Mass which became the very diminishing of graces that Protestants, and all other false religions proclaim and which religions believe and teach and preach that grace is not necessary for salvation. Can we not all see the truth of how the ‘New Mass’ is a Protestant style of worship in so many, many ways because as Fr. John Hardon, S. J. taught that Protestantism is: “graceless Old Covenant Christianity.”
>
> As Father John Hardon has continuously taught, all Protestantism, in truth, is graceless because it denies the authority of Jesus Christ to establish a Church. Whoever denies His Church, the Roman Catholic Church, denies Christ because the Church is His Mystical Body here on earth. And His Mystical Body produces all the graces through the Mass, Eucharist, and Sacraments so absolutely necessary for salvation.
What does this mean but that if one is not united "in prayer" with the one true Church, as he must be "in faith" and "in doctrine" to be saved, then he has no graces whatsoever for salvation. And if that prayer of the Church, the Mass, is the not the most perfect prayer and the 'sine qua non' prayer of the Church in reparation for the sins of man is deficient, insincere, or lacking in graces then Almighty God is not appeased in any way but offended. Now the current prayer of the Church, the "Novus Ordo Missae" or the New Mass, happens to be a less efficacious prayer and sacrifice to God for graces than the "Missa Latina Tridentina", the most efficacious prayer to God of ages in the Catholic Church for sin.
This is true and it must be true from Christ Our Lord's own words when He explained what grace filled prayer really and truly means in Holy Scripture:
>
“Two men went up to the temple to pray, the one a Pharisee and the other a publican. The Pharisee stood and began to pray thus within himself: ‘O God, I thank Thee that I am not like the rest of men, robbers, dishonest, adulterers, or even like this publican. I fast twice a week; I pay tithes of all that I possess.’ But the Publican, standing afar off, would not so much as lift up his eyes to heaven, but kept striking his breast, saying, ‘O God, be merciful to me the sinner!’ I tell you, this man went back to his home justified rather than the other; for everyone who exalts himself shall be humbled, and he who humbles himself shall be exalted.” (Luke 18: 10-14).
>
> These words are absolute, fully prophetic, and binding forever on how to pray acceptably to God, for they are the words of the Savior of all humanity Himself. Anything less is inefficacious prayer before God, graceless, meaningless, and self-congratulatory prayer like the Pharisee's. This in truth is the "Novus Ordo Missae" as well as any prayer to God not fully and totally united with the prayers of the Catholic Church; for they are less efficacious and they shall always be so from the words of Our Lord Jesus Christ.
>
> This is the latent heresy of Vatican II that deemed a man-made prayer of political correctness, a truly pharisaical style prayer in the “Novus Ordo Missae”, which is self-congratulatory about one’s own holiness by a subtle covering up of sin, to be just as efficacious a prayer as the “Missa Latina Tridentina”, which does not fail to seek pardon, absolution and remission of one’s sins throughout the Mass as the humble repentant publican did so overtly and directly before God in every way possible.
>
> As we have seen heretofore, for efficacious prayer in the Church, not only must every participant be "physically" present, as the Council of Florence maintained, but he must be mentally and voluntarily present to receive the spiritual graces so necessary for one's salvation. Thus he must be united totally with the Church in sacrifice. Apart from those not perfectly joined to the Church, let us examine now the "Novus Ordo Missae" and its imperfect sacrificial worship for sin. If the priest, the very officiator of sacrifice himself does not show repentance for his own sins clearly, how can the participants in the sacrificial worship of the “Novus Ordo Missae” ever hope to do so, for their worship is subordinate to his? This is easy to see if one only considers how there was deleted from the “Novus Ordo Missae” is the crucial language of the priest at the beginning of Tridentine Mass– “God, grant me pardon, absolution and remission of my sins.” Also deliberately extracted was the priest’s own “Confiteor” for his sins in the “Novus Ordo Missae” as opposed to the Tridentine Mass. Woefully absent, too, is the public declaration at the Offertory of the priest’s very reason for offering sacrifice to God and why it is to be offered to God: “For my innumerable, sins, offenses, and negligences.” Therefore, the very heart and soul of the publican’s humble prayer is ‘his own innumerable sins, offenses, and neglegences” that kept him from even raising his head to God in the temple for mercy. If this is the case for the priest in the "Novus Ordo Missae", a consummate inability to express proper repentance for sin, how is there any viable hope for the people to ever receive pardon, absolution and remission for their sins, the most proper propitiatory ingredient for forgiveness of sin to Almighty God which the publican so dutifully represented.
> To diminish one's sense of sin in the human heart as the "Novus Ordo Missae" so arrogantly does, is the very same obtuseness of spirit which saturates the Pharisaical heart that Our Divine Lord so ardently condemned for its unwillingness to repent. "Repent for the kingdom of God is at hand" is what the Pharisee could not bring himself to do, and therefore he was condemned by Our Lord. One of the most significant problems of the "Novus Ordo Missae" is its complete failure to express proper humility and propitiation to Almighty God for sin.
>
>
>
> “Latent Heresy, Vatican II and Apostasy”
>
> II
>
>
>
> Let us now consider the essential argument why Vatican II and the New Mass are heretical in a most profound way even though the heresy may be latent, covert, and difficult to discern; at the same time being bold as to its effrontery, its daring, and its seeming visibility. This is the number one technique of Satan who knows as much how to appear truthful as he knows how to attack and destroy all truth. To make heresy appear as legitimate Church teaching and at the very same time to deny the truth, is his favorite ploy. An unstudied truth, an unclear truth becomes ambiguous, and is the work of the evil one and not of the Church. .
>
> Nowhere could it be more audacious than to place his greatest attack upon Church teaching right in the center of the liturgy, at its most sacred and solemn moment, in the very Consecration of the Mass when the priest utters the very words of the world’s greatest miracle over the bread and wine which become the Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ.
>
> How is this so? Clearly the alteration of Our Lord’s own sacred words in the Consecration of the wine into Christ’s Blood by changing “for many” to “for all” fulfills this most clandestine attack of Satan’s treachery. Herein lies both the fallacious teachings of the Council and Pope Paul VI’s own shocking statement regarding the “smoke of Satan”, which he himself admitted had crept into the sanctuary of the Church, and which is the ultimate heresy of the ages: “outside the Church there is salvation.” To change or even diminish the forcefulness of the words of Institution, uttered by Our Divine Lord Himself, is the arrogant and nefarious attack of Satan upon the Body and Blood of Christ and His one true Church. If anything Satan craves to render inefficacious or make unworthy the holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the most perfect prayer of the Church. In particular this is so because it appears as no violation of the Church’s teachings by altering this one simple word “for many” or “multis” in the Latin to “for all” or the Latin “omnibus”. In reality this seems so perfectly correct and free of any error to the vast majority of all Catholics for so long now, whether they be hierarchy or the laity, therefore Satan’s attack remains to this day covert and accepted as true.
>
> However, it is not acceptable in the slightest even though Satan’s clever tactics may seem so and have been acceptable to so many. Why can this be? For no reason more obvious than the fact Christ Our Divine Savior did not die “for all” unto the remission of sins but only “for many”, and that “many” are those who have been called to worship and pray together in the most Holy Catholic Church. And of that “many”, called according to Church teaching for centuries, just a “few” will actually merit salvation for Christ taught over and over again, in so many different ways, that “many” are called but only “few” chosen. This is the perennial magisterium of Church teaching up to Vatican Council II and the “Novus Ordo Missae.” This is also one of the greatest mysteries of Christendom: “many are called but few are chosen", a truth that ever so few accept today even in the Catholic Church!
>
> Now to say, teach, or imply, even ambiguously in the liturgy that Christ died so that “all” shall be saved is rank, unadulterated heresy, which denies the salvation of Christ’s Passion and Death, and worst of all makes His sacrifice meaningless. For if Our Divine Savior died to save “all”, then truly “outside the Church there is salvation,” and there is really no need for anyone to reside within His Catholic Church for salvation where only a “few of many” shall be saved. However, it then becomes clear if Christ died for a “few” only then the special graces of His Passion and Death have meaning and will only benefit souls that “willingly” cooperate with the graces from his Body and Blood offered efficaciously to His Heavenly Father in sacrificial worship at Mass for one's sins. Moreover, while a few only are ultimately saved, it is true Christ wants or desires all to be saved and fairly, if not abundantly, distributes graces to all for salvation; nevertheless, He died not “for all” but for “many” as Holy Scripture states; in other words, He died for a “few”. This is a doctrine of the faith and doctrines ought to teach us how to think Catholic and to think correctly about salvation for the very word “doctrine” comes from the Latin word for “teaching”.
>
> And again the vague and ambiguous “all” then proves Martin Luther was right and the Catholic Church was wrong for centuries, for Luther taught that “works” do not matter for salvation, only faith in the Blood of Christ really matters and those who simply believe in His Blood will assuredly be saved in spite of their works. Certainly then not a “few of many” who do good works as the Catholic Church has taught erroneously for centuries will be saved, says Luther, for then works would be particularly important for one’s salvation. This could not be for Luther, for “many” puts the lie to “outside the Church there is salvation”, while “all” makes room for all of Luther’s followers to argue for justification in faith alone or “sola fides” for salvation.
>
> Now “all” also ambiguously reaches out to the rest of the false religions of the world. Consequently, even the most egregious of all entries and the most heretical in the Catholic Catechism has credibility which states and implies unequivocally that “we are all believers in the same God” Islam and Judaism and Christians, so, therefore, we are all brothers and sisters.” Consider the following entries 841 & 842:
>
> (841) The Church’s relationship with Muslims: “The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.”
>
> (842) The Church’s bond with non-Christian religions is in the first place the common origin and end of the human race: All nations form but one community. This is so because all men stem from the one stock which God created to people the entire earth, and also because all share a common destiny, namely God. His providence, evident goodness, and saving designs extend to all against the day when the elect are gathered together in the holy city.
>
What folly, what heresy, what false teaching enters the hearts and souls of members of the one true Church by using "all" so ambiguously and wrongly, thus causing them to stop proselytizing “outside the Church there is no salvation.” Therefore, the Church with this heretical teaching of Vatican II and the New Mass have changed the reason why Christ truly died “for many” unto the remission of sins to the heretical “for all”.
>
> Now Satan’s trickery and the New Mass make it sound like Christ is more loving than even His Church which mistakenly taught for centuries and centuries “outside the Church there is no salvation”, but now in the New Church of the "Novus Ordo", the indefinable 'church of Christ', Christ inexplicably died “for all” making salvation more universal, generous, and egalitarian than Christ's own words. Why then, of course, “the Catholic Church subsists in the church of Christ,” making it no longer an asylum for the conversion and healing of sinners but now a more egalitarian one world church to which the most perverse and depraved of mankind in all their deviant wickedness against God's eternal Goodness and Commandments can also be benignly included.
>
> Consequently, the Church doors open to universal salvation, syncretism, world religion, and “outside the church there is salvation” as John Paul II demonstrated so scandalously at Assisi, Italy in 1988, praying together with all satanical religions and cults of the world as equals and not teaching them to pray only with the Church that alone gives salvation through Jesus Christ.
>
> Nevertheless, in spite of all this heretical teaching by Vatican II and the Counciliar popes, Pope Paul VI and John Paul II, we can be most thankful to St. Peter, the first apostle and first pope, for his true Catholic Orthodoxy in teaching this doctrine unambiguously, truthfully, and with clarity, right in Holy Scriptures itself that “outside the Church there is no salvation.” Many modernists will find this difficult to believe who now have seized control of the Church since the revolution of Vatican II and the “Novus Ordo Missae” from its very top in Rome to the pews inside the local Church, but nevertheless, here is the Great St. Peter’s teaching of this most crucial of all doctrines, right in Sacred Scriptures, by the rock of Peter Himself:
>
“Be you also as stones built up, a spiritual house, a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God by Jesus Christ. Wherefore it is said in the scripture: ‘Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious. And he that shall believe in Him shall not be confounded.’ ” (1Peter 2: 4-5)
>
> The very head of the Church at its very inception, the first pope, makes clear that this doctrine is everlasting in the economy of Salvation in such a beautiful metaphor, for without being part of the ‘spiritual house’, the Church, one cannot offer acceptable sacrifice to God, nor can one save his soul for he will inevitably be “confounded.”
>
> So precious, so sacred is the priesthood within the Church, says St. Peter, that all the time it must be ‘holy’ and the sacrifices it offers up to God must likewise be ‘spiritual.’ If the victim is not Jesus Christ then the sacrifice cannot be ‘spiritual’ nor is it possible for the priesthood, therefore, to be ‘holy’. To say or imply in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass that Christ died for “all” then the sacrifice is neither ‘spiritual’ nor the priesthood ‘holy’ nor the Victim JesusChrist. Not ‘spiritual’ because the implication is everyone shall be saved, and not ‘holy’ because the victim cannot, not be Jesus Christ, for the words and the teachings are not His. Thus the validity, too, of such masses becomes grievously 'suspect.'
>
> Furthermore, it is not spiritual, because to say everyone shall be saved or imply it, means no effort is necessary for salvation and so, in spite of our works, no sacrifice is necessary, no effort, no virtue, no holiness is required on man’s part because Redemption becomes simply a free gift to all from God and really His Son did not have to die because God is bestowing this gift on mankind in spite of His Son’s Passion and Death.
> Lest one thinks this is some false supposition amongst orthodox Catholics in the hierarchy or laity and not the true reality of this most heretical aberration in Church teaching and the liturgy, consider this entry in the Catechism of the Catholic Church entry #847:
>
Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience–those too may achieve eternal salvation.
>
To teach that salvation is possible if one is only "sincere" in his beliefs outside the Church, or that one simply fails to come in contact with a missionary of the Catholic Church or that one "ever came to doubt" his false teaching or beliefs makes a mockery of God’s sufficiency of grace for salvation for every soul, defies the perennial magisterium of the centuries and is consummate heresy on the part of Lumen Gentium from Vatican II in denying "outside the Church there is no salvation." This is true because so-called invincible ignorance, if this is what one who is sincerely ignorant of the faith possesses, only forgives one's soul of the sin of heresy but still he needs the necessary graces for salvation that only the Catholic Church provides and guarantees for physical members alone. Consequently, we see the utter importance of Our Lord’s command, in spite of all else, to go forth, therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost, and those who are baptized shall be saved; those who are not shall be condemned.
>
> In the economy of salvation, God has demanded absolutely from His Church certain things, one of which is–no exceptions–to baptize all in the Name of the Trinity, the very essence of our Catholic faith. And this Baptism must include the pouring of water and the proper sign of the cross with a total willingness to be baptized on the part of the catechumen. This is the undeniable teaching of Trent with no exceptions of so-called Baptism of Desire or Baptism of Blood as liberals like to claim with Vatican II. When Trent speaks of “desire” and baptism, it means the person’s 'willingness' to be baptized not a free-for-all Baptism of Desire or Blood as fallacious Vatican II Catechisms and documents try to maintain. As for the heresy of the Catholic Church having three Baptisms, including Baptisms of Blood and Desire, the Council of Florence solemnly defined that "no baptism of blood exists for "even if one pours out his blood for Jesus Christ, if he is not within the "bosom and unity" of the Church before death, it is of no avail." Finally, St. John condemns any baptism of blood or of man's 'willing' or desiring, for he states in the Last Gospel of every "Missa Latina Tridentina that "for those who believe in Him, they are born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God." Is it any wonder that the Last Gospel was eliminated by Paul VI' for the "Novus Ordo Missae?"
To demonstrate the mounting crisis of evangelization in the Church from all of this, consider only the story of a relative who once asked a priest in the LA Diocese on how she ought to approach a friend who was not Catholic and her obligation concerning the "Great Command," and the modernist priest blithely quipped; “Oh we don’t do that anymore!”
>
>
>
> Heresy and the Papacy
>
> III
>
>
>
> All of this leads to the ultimate question of whether Vatican II, with its documents and the New Mass of Paul VI is truly heretical. The answer is unequivocally affirmative in the following respects. First, when Pius IX made an exception to Eugene IV's Council of Florence Boniface, he opened the door to the latent modernist heresy of ecumenism by diminishing the solid teaching of “outside the Church there is no salvation”, when he said someone ‘in good faith’ can also be saved such as pagans, Protestants, Jews, or Islamists if they are ‘invincibly ignorant’ and believe the truth. Invincible Ignorance simply does not save one’s soul but only forgives one of the sin of heresy, as Thomas Aquinas states emphatically.
>
> The whole question of how anyone can be “in good faith” and yet rejects Christ’s Church and still can be saved, not only diminishes God’s command by Pope Eugene IV who initiated this doctrinal truth “outside the Church there is no salvation” at the Council of Florence in the 15th century but also challenges the logic of human reason in light of the sufficiency of God’s Almighty grace to everyman for his salvation. Herein lies the “diabolic disorientation” of Vatican Council II from the modernism of the Conciliar Bishops and Cardinals own tinkering with eternal truth and God’s absolute "Great Command" to go therefore and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit; those who are baptized will be saved and those who are not will e condemned."
>
> This diminishing of truth is latent heresy always: wherever it is done, however it is done, or wherever it is done or countenanced by Pope, Bishops, Cardinals or Priests, Catechists or whoever teaches the Roman Catholic Faith of the ages. Let us only consider Our Divine Teacher’s own words on this:
>
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not one letter, not one stroke of a letter, will pass from the law until all is accomplished.” (Matt 5: 17-18.)
>
Pope Paul VI especially countenanced this aberration of Christ’s "Great Command" and, moreover, still allowed this deception of Vatican II along with "Lumen Gentium" to go forth to the flock and forthwith scatter the sheep after the Council. Consider his own personally written document of Vatican II–“Nostra Aetate”, a document riddled with contradictions, half-truths, and mindless alternatives to “outside the Church there is no salvation.”
>
> We must realize here that even if it were true that of one could be ‘invincibly ignorant’ and that those who are unbaptized or those in heresy like Protestants or schismatics are still, nevertheless, not truly bodily members of the Church whether they are ‘invincibly ignorant’ or not and must still “work out their eternal salvation in fear and trembling” as St. Paul states. Therefore, the apartness from the vine, even though a seeming good branch at first observation, still lacks the sanctifying graces of total and complete Church unity from the Mass, the Sacraments, Penance and the Eucharist for salvation because of not full attachment to the Vine, a diminishment that will eventually cause the branch to wither, be jettisoned, and inevitably die. These words are the words of the Divine Word Himself in Holy Scripture and how we must be attached to the vine.
>
> One cannot be united "in faith" with Holy Mother Church and not "in prayer." The final word on unity in baptism, not two baptisms or three baptisms but one baptism in the Holy Catholic Church, is to be found in Christ Himself who was baptized by St. John the Baptist with water and the Holy Spirit Who came down upon Him in what was a Triune Sign of the Cross with the Heavenly Father. If Christ Who needed no baptism was baptized Himself in such humility as the perfect example to us, then all who shall enter His kingdom must likewise be so baptized. There is absolutely no extra-sacramental baptism of the Catholic Church, when Christ Our Lord used the sacraments Himself as the ultimate way, truth, and life of our faith and salvation.
>
> Heresy is heresy; however the difference between formal and material heresies cannot be ignored in Paul VI and the Council’s case with “Lumen Gentium” in general and “Nostra Aetate” by Paul VI in particular.
>
> Look at the fruits, look at the wreckage of the Church and the loss of millions of souls in the last forty years from this heretical teaching and practice, which was unmistakably latent and covert, nevertheless propagated and vigorously advocated by Paul VI, Vatican II and the Conciliar popes. While Paul VI did not teach ‘ex cathedra’ that “outside the Church there is salvation” officially , which would have made him a formal heretic, nonetheless, his weakness and pusillanimous leadership and vision to eradicate this atrocity of Vatican II makes him and the Council Fathers at least material heretics. God save us by the firm hand and teaching hand of Pope Benedict XVI and the Tridentine Mass to correct forever this covert heresy that still decimates the most Holy Catholic Church.
Benedict XVI, a most faithful shepherd and servant of the Lord, who has demanded that this aberration of "all are saved" be altered to "many are saved" is ignored to this very day by hundreds and thousands of his own bishops and priests, a scandal of scandals. Let us conclude with our Lord's Words on the supernatural fate of such scandalous behaviors:
"The Son of man shall send his angels, and they shall gather out of His kingdom all scandals, and them that work iniquity. And shall
cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. (Matt 13 41-42)
–To be continued–
> J Hughes Dunphy
>
> Or as St. Paul likewise delineates on the truth: “Avoid the profane novelties of words and oppositions of knowledge falsely so called, which some promising, have erred concerning the faith.” (1Tim: 20-1) In no uncertain terms St. Paul is warning the flock against heretics and their fallacious new teaching.
>
> These novelties, which are abominable new teachings and instructions on the faith for “itching ears”, are at the heart of the confusion of modernism and the unprecedented error promulgated by the Second Vatican Council, this so-called great council of the Church. Latently heretical, and clandestinely perfidious was Vatican II in failing to promulgate the perennial magisterium of the Catholic faith through the centuries by rethinking it, by rephrasing it, and by “reformulating the truth positively” as the Catholic Catechism states erroneously on several doctrinal truths. That being said, lo and behold we have the heretical documents and teachings of this so-called holy Church council militating often against the perennial magisterium of the Catholic faith established through the centuries, creating a most insidious dereliction of Catholic truth.
>
> While there are several new teachings or novelties of Vatican II for “itching ears”, which invite error, confusion, and heresy, none more egregiously does this than “Lumen Gentium” and its rethinking of “outside the Church there is no salvation.” This one instance of “new thinking or new teaching of Tradition was so catastrophic that it alone brought down the defensive walls of Rome that had formerly been intact for centuries. Tradition is not ‘new teaching’ nor as St. Paul says can it be construed as “novelty.” This would be a contradiction of traditional Church teachings by failing to state the truth authoritatively and unambiguously, but instead rethinking it, making Vatican II stand out as the one and only Council of the twenty-three Church Councils since the inception of Christianity to have caused heresy to spread and to reign in the hearts of the faithful, instead of fighting, opposing, and exposing it vigorously as every other Church Council had done from Nicea onward. This is the major heresy of Vatican II for having diminished, watered down, and lessened this most significant of all doctrinal statements of the Roman Catholic Church through the centuries that “outside the Church there is no salvation.”
>
> Not stating vociferously this ultimate truth and reevaluating it less emphatically caused several other covert heresies to rear their ugly heads all over again. How, one may ask? Through satanical double speak and making vice seem like virtue and virtue like vice, the darkness of past error and heretical teachings once more surfaced in the church in such a volatile way that a conglomeration of false theology broke through the formerly impregnable walls of Rome’s Eternal City via a Trojan horse of modernism, the coming together of all heresies in this final attack upon God’s Holy Church before the Tribulation and End Times commence. Here is the train of heretical teachings rising from the corpse of “outside the Church there is no salvation” that has resulted from this one most heretical and sinister council of the Catholic faith, that purposely mis-taught “outside the Church there is no salvation” :
>
> a.) no need to baptize anymore souls into the one true Church of Roman Catholicism.
>
> b.) no need for the sacraments to be saved, especially the sacrament of Penance for the
>
> forgiveness of sins.
>
> c.) no need for the Eucharist and the infinite graces it affords for salvation.
>
> d.) religions “outside the Church” need not convert and, therefore, no longer exclusively require the signal graces from Christ’s Mystical Body, the Church, to be saved all because the Second Vatican Council denied the sufficiency of grace given by Almighty God to every soul for its salvation by teaching “outside the Church there is salvation.”
>
>
>
> One cannot rethink sacred tradition or “restate it positively” in some new way less forcefully or clearly we have a denial of the important truths of the Catholic faith. Such was the case in “Lumen Gentium” which takes exception to the perennial magisterium of the centuries that taught absolutely and irrevocably from the Council of Florence that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church. It states so unequivocally with the following:
>
>
>
> Pope Eugene IV solemnly pronounced, “that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics (Protestants) and schismatics, can have a share in life eternal; but that they will go into the eternal fire, ‘which was prepared for the devil and his angels,’ unless before death they are joined with her; and that so important is the unity of this ecclesiastical body that only those remaining within this unity can profit by the Sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, their Almsgiving, their other works of Christian piety, and the duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the name of Christ, can be saved, unless he remain within the bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church.”
>
>
>
> Herein lies the clash of Vatican II and its decree of “Lumen Gentium” with the perennial magisterium of the ages as taught in the Council of Florence and Pope Eugene IV’s infallible statement above that one must, must “remain within the bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church” in order to be saved when Vatican II stated the following from #846 from the Catholic Catechism and its heretical exception that “those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience–those too may achieve eternal salvation.”
>
> When Florence demands physical unity that ‘one must remain within the bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church to be saved, how can Vatican II justify itself as a legitimate Church Council when it makes such a heretical exception to Florence by suggesting the following subsequent heresies from this false exception:
>
> a. “ That through no fault of their own, one does not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church.” How can this be when the Church has preached through the centuries to the most primitive peoples the Gospel. And with modern communications no one can within reason be ignorant of the gospel of Jesus Christ unto salvation! Since Florence made no exception to the necessity of ‘physical unity’; therefore, all disunity is culpable in light of God’s graces, sufficiently given to save every soul that cooperates with them to find and enter the Church.
>
> b. “But who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do His Will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience.” This is a satanical paradox caused by the diabolical disorientation of modernism that controlled Vatican II, and which implies herein that someone can be moved by graces from God to remain outside His one true Church ‘sincerely’ and still be saved. This literally mocks God’s graces and the perennial magisterial teaching of the centuries which has taught that God gives to every soul a ‘sufficient amount of grace to be saved’, which graces all would lead anyone of sincere mind and heart to ‘the bosom and unity’ of His one true Church.
>
>
>
> This outrageously heterodox exception to Florence and the perennial magisterium of the centuries was nothing more nor less than an alteration to the infallible teaching of Pope Eugene IV and the Council of Florence in 1441. One, therefore, cannot rethink Sacred Tradition or restate in some new way ‘more positively’ else we clearly have a violation and denial of an important truth of the Catholic faith. What makes the arrogance of Vatican II even more frightening is it had the audacity to deny a doctrine taught and proclaimed by every pope from before Eugene IV and the Council of Florence back through all preceding Christian centuries.
>
> This clever subterfuge of verbal legerdemain by the Council fathers was, indeed a satanic ploy perpetrated by the modernists at the Council. To in any way mitigate the necessity of total unity with the one true Church by actual physical membership in the Catholic Church to be saved diminishes the “ex cathedra” pronouncement of Eugene IV at another Council of the Church in Florence, a doctrinal council, by the way, unlike Vatican II which was only a pastoral council. It was the Council of Florence which infallibly taught "outside the Church there is no salvation."
>
> Moreover, this stubborn unholy delight of Vatican II, which also took heretic satisfaction in calling the many-faceted errors of Protestantism, so replete with a multitude of heresies to this very day as somehow part and parcel of the Roman Catholic Church is simply too much to believe. Consider only a few of these heretical Reformation errors and their utter severity and why this cannot be true – i.e. ‘once–saved always–saved; forgiveness of sin requires no priest or Sacrament of Penance; the Holy Eucharist is merely a symbol; the bible and not the Church is the ‘pillar and foundation of the truth. This capitulation of Vatican II to Protestantism is what ultimately destroyed not only the faith of millions of once faithful Catholics but also destroyed the potential faith of millions of more would-be Protestant converts. All these potential converts might have seen why they must inevitably convert to the one true Church to be saved.. Consequently, they all remain outside of the Church and are led to think by Vatican II and the New Catechism that they are saved in some form of ‘quasi invisible supernatural extra-ecclesial membership of ecumenical modernist rhetoric. In fact, Vatican II and "Lumen Gentium" have done everything to dissuade Catholics from proselytizing such non-believers by encouraging all Catholics to learn non-Catholic doctrines and beliefs, to dialogue with them as if truth could be debated and, most horrendous of all, to even participate in such heretical, schismatic and neo-pagan prayer services.
>
> A thing cannot ‘be’ and ‘not’ be at the same time or one can call Protestants as members of the Catholic Church and not members at the same time i.e. pertinacious heretics. This is the undeniable twisted logic of Satan, that he can be God and yet, in reality, not be God at the very same time! This is the basic principle of false logic and contradiction. In short, a gigantic lie!!!
>
> From this false teaching of Vatican II, attempting to redefine or repackage the ultimate truth of the centuries “outside the Church there is no salvation” came the ‘new Mass’ or the “Novus Ordo Missae” which like the teachings of the Council diminished the power of graces in the work of evangelization and the salvation of souls. ‘Lex credendi est lex orandi.” False teachings and belief in God’s Almighty Graces which lead all souls to His Son’s one true Church cannot yield their precious fruit of salvation of souls if they are denied.
>
> Now the Council denied these efficacious graces of conversion, so necessary for anyone’s salvation, because it denied the absolute necessity of physical unity with the one true Church to be saved. When the Council denied these efficacious graces, it also denied the perennial magisterium of the centuries in Sacred Tradition that always taught “outside the Church there is no salvation.”
>
> Now how did Vatican II deny these efficacious graces? It did so unequivocally by saying physical unity is no longer absolutely necessary to be saved but a quasi-separatist unity is just fine which at the same time diminished the absolute need for one to be united ‘in prayer’ with the Church to be saved. This is the essence of the latent heresy advocated by the Council fathers of Vatican II, that unity can exist ‘ in faith’ but not ‘in prayer’ with other religions in general and Liberal Protestantism in particular. This is all so very visible in Vatican Council II's documents, and in particular "Lumen Gentium." This is an egregious reawakening of a centuries old heresy: ‘outside the Church there is salvation.’
>
> When the Council denied these efficacious graces of absolute physical unity, it also denied the perennial magisterium of the centuries in Sacred Tradition that always taught, in season and out of season, ‘outside the Church there is no salvation.’ This doctrine always required the unity to be compete and total, not only ‘in faith’ but also ‘in prayer’. This doctrine of being united especially with the Church in prayer for salvation was solemnly defined at Florence and again reaffirmed at Trent.
>
> What does this mean but that if one is not united ‘in prayer’ with the one true Church, as he must be ‘in faith and doctrine’ to be saved, then he lacks the necessary graces for eternal salvation. Why is this true?
>
> For two reasons: The first is because all the graces of the sacraments, and especially Penance, which above all is most necessary for forgiveness of sins in the whole world, and the most Holy Eucharist without which one has ‘no life in his soul,’ and the Mass–the most perfect sacrificial prayer to God to increase sanctifying graces in one’s soul are all, woefully, missing graces for those “outside the Church.” All of these sacraments of salvation are only possible to a soul absolutely and totally united physically with the one true Church of Jesus Christ, the Roman Catholic Church. By the same token it is impossible to claim unity ‘in prayer’ with the Church, in order to be saved and receive the necessary graces for salvation , if one is not totally joined to the one true Church both physically and spiritually. Simply graces do not flow like a faucet upon those who do not care or are not present ‘within the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.’
>
> And the second reason is because of the “Novus Ordo Missae” or the New Order of the Mass which became the very diminishing of graces that Protestants, and all other false religions proclaim and which religions believe and teach and preach that grace is not necessary for salvation. Can we not all see the truth of how the ‘New Mass’ is a Protestant style of worship in so many, many ways because as Fr. John Hardon, S. J. taught that Protestantism is: “graceless Old Covenant Christianity.”
>
> As Father John Hardon has continuously taught, all Protestantism, in truth, is graceless because it denies the authority of Jesus Christ to establish a Church. Whoever denies His Church, the Roman Catholic Church, denies Christ because the Church is His Mystical Body here on earth. And His Mystical Body produces all the graces through the Mass, Eucharist, and Sacraments so absolutely necessary for salvation.
What does this mean but that if one is not united "in prayer" with the one true Church, as he must be "in faith" and "in doctrine" to be saved, then he has no graces whatsoever for salvation. And if that prayer of the Church, the Mass, is the not the most perfect prayer and the 'sine qua non' prayer of the Church in reparation for the sins of man is deficient, insincere, or lacking in graces then Almighty God is not appeased in any way but offended. Now the current prayer of the Church, the "Novus Ordo Missae" or the New Mass, happens to be a less efficacious prayer and sacrifice to God for graces than the "Missa Latina Tridentina", the most efficacious prayer to God of ages in the Catholic Church for sin.
This is true and it must be true from Christ Our Lord's own words when He explained what grace filled prayer really and truly means in Holy Scripture:
>
“Two men went up to the temple to pray, the one a Pharisee and the other a publican. The Pharisee stood and began to pray thus within himself: ‘O God, I thank Thee that I am not like the rest of men, robbers, dishonest, adulterers, or even like this publican. I fast twice a week; I pay tithes of all that I possess.’ But the Publican, standing afar off, would not so much as lift up his eyes to heaven, but kept striking his breast, saying, ‘O God, be merciful to me the sinner!’ I tell you, this man went back to his home justified rather than the other; for everyone who exalts himself shall be humbled, and he who humbles himself shall be exalted.” (Luke 18: 10-14).
>
> These words are absolute, fully prophetic, and binding forever on how to pray acceptably to God, for they are the words of the Savior of all humanity Himself. Anything less is inefficacious prayer before God, graceless, meaningless, and self-congratulatory prayer like the Pharisee's. This in truth is the "Novus Ordo Missae" as well as any prayer to God not fully and totally united with the prayers of the Catholic Church; for they are less efficacious and they shall always be so from the words of Our Lord Jesus Christ.
>
> This is the latent heresy of Vatican II that deemed a man-made prayer of political correctness, a truly pharisaical style prayer in the “Novus Ordo Missae”, which is self-congratulatory about one’s own holiness by a subtle covering up of sin, to be just as efficacious a prayer as the “Missa Latina Tridentina”, which does not fail to seek pardon, absolution and remission of one’s sins throughout the Mass as the humble repentant publican did so overtly and directly before God in every way possible.
>
> As we have seen heretofore, for efficacious prayer in the Church, not only must every participant be "physically" present, as the Council of Florence maintained, but he must be mentally and voluntarily present to receive the spiritual graces so necessary for one's salvation. Thus he must be united totally with the Church in sacrifice. Apart from those not perfectly joined to the Church, let us examine now the "Novus Ordo Missae" and its imperfect sacrificial worship for sin. If the priest, the very officiator of sacrifice himself does not show repentance for his own sins clearly, how can the participants in the sacrificial worship of the “Novus Ordo Missae” ever hope to do so, for their worship is subordinate to his? This is easy to see if one only considers how there was deleted from the “Novus Ordo Missae” is the crucial language of the priest at the beginning of Tridentine Mass– “God, grant me pardon, absolution and remission of my sins.” Also deliberately extracted was the priest’s own “Confiteor” for his sins in the “Novus Ordo Missae” as opposed to the Tridentine Mass. Woefully absent, too, is the public declaration at the Offertory of the priest’s very reason for offering sacrifice to God and why it is to be offered to God: “For my innumerable, sins, offenses, and negligences.” Therefore, the very heart and soul of the publican’s humble prayer is ‘his own innumerable sins, offenses, and neglegences” that kept him from even raising his head to God in the temple for mercy. If this is the case for the priest in the "Novus Ordo Missae", a consummate inability to express proper repentance for sin, how is there any viable hope for the people to ever receive pardon, absolution and remission for their sins, the most proper propitiatory ingredient for forgiveness of sin to Almighty God which the publican so dutifully represented.
> To diminish one's sense of sin in the human heart as the "Novus Ordo Missae" so arrogantly does, is the very same obtuseness of spirit which saturates the Pharisaical heart that Our Divine Lord so ardently condemned for its unwillingness to repent. "Repent for the kingdom of God is at hand" is what the Pharisee could not bring himself to do, and therefore he was condemned by Our Lord. One of the most significant problems of the "Novus Ordo Missae" is its complete failure to express proper humility and propitiation to Almighty God for sin.
>
>
>
> “Latent Heresy, Vatican II and Apostasy”
>
> II
>
>
>
> Let us now consider the essential argument why Vatican II and the New Mass are heretical in a most profound way even though the heresy may be latent, covert, and difficult to discern; at the same time being bold as to its effrontery, its daring, and its seeming visibility. This is the number one technique of Satan who knows as much how to appear truthful as he knows how to attack and destroy all truth. To make heresy appear as legitimate Church teaching and at the very same time to deny the truth, is his favorite ploy. An unstudied truth, an unclear truth becomes ambiguous, and is the work of the evil one and not of the Church. .
>
> Nowhere could it be more audacious than to place his greatest attack upon Church teaching right in the center of the liturgy, at its most sacred and solemn moment, in the very Consecration of the Mass when the priest utters the very words of the world’s greatest miracle over the bread and wine which become the Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ.
>
> How is this so? Clearly the alteration of Our Lord’s own sacred words in the Consecration of the wine into Christ’s Blood by changing “for many” to “for all” fulfills this most clandestine attack of Satan’s treachery. Herein lies both the fallacious teachings of the Council and Pope Paul VI’s own shocking statement regarding the “smoke of Satan”, which he himself admitted had crept into the sanctuary of the Church, and which is the ultimate heresy of the ages: “outside the Church there is salvation.” To change or even diminish the forcefulness of the words of Institution, uttered by Our Divine Lord Himself, is the arrogant and nefarious attack of Satan upon the Body and Blood of Christ and His one true Church. If anything Satan craves to render inefficacious or make unworthy the holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the most perfect prayer of the Church. In particular this is so because it appears as no violation of the Church’s teachings by altering this one simple word “for many” or “multis” in the Latin to “for all” or the Latin “omnibus”. In reality this seems so perfectly correct and free of any error to the vast majority of all Catholics for so long now, whether they be hierarchy or the laity, therefore Satan’s attack remains to this day covert and accepted as true.
>
> However, it is not acceptable in the slightest even though Satan’s clever tactics may seem so and have been acceptable to so many. Why can this be? For no reason more obvious than the fact Christ Our Divine Savior did not die “for all” unto the remission of sins but only “for many”, and that “many” are those who have been called to worship and pray together in the most Holy Catholic Church. And of that “many”, called according to Church teaching for centuries, just a “few” will actually merit salvation for Christ taught over and over again, in so many different ways, that “many” are called but only “few” chosen. This is the perennial magisterium of Church teaching up to Vatican Council II and the “Novus Ordo Missae.” This is also one of the greatest mysteries of Christendom: “many are called but few are chosen", a truth that ever so few accept today even in the Catholic Church!
>
> Now to say, teach, or imply, even ambiguously in the liturgy that Christ died so that “all” shall be saved is rank, unadulterated heresy, which denies the salvation of Christ’s Passion and Death, and worst of all makes His sacrifice meaningless. For if Our Divine Savior died to save “all”, then truly “outside the Church there is salvation,” and there is really no need for anyone to reside within His Catholic Church for salvation where only a “few of many” shall be saved. However, it then becomes clear if Christ died for a “few” only then the special graces of His Passion and Death have meaning and will only benefit souls that “willingly” cooperate with the graces from his Body and Blood offered efficaciously to His Heavenly Father in sacrificial worship at Mass for one's sins. Moreover, while a few only are ultimately saved, it is true Christ wants or desires all to be saved and fairly, if not abundantly, distributes graces to all for salvation; nevertheless, He died not “for all” but for “many” as Holy Scripture states; in other words, He died for a “few”. This is a doctrine of the faith and doctrines ought to teach us how to think Catholic and to think correctly about salvation for the very word “doctrine” comes from the Latin word for “teaching”.
>
> And again the vague and ambiguous “all” then proves Martin Luther was right and the Catholic Church was wrong for centuries, for Luther taught that “works” do not matter for salvation, only faith in the Blood of Christ really matters and those who simply believe in His Blood will assuredly be saved in spite of their works. Certainly then not a “few of many” who do good works as the Catholic Church has taught erroneously for centuries will be saved, says Luther, for then works would be particularly important for one’s salvation. This could not be for Luther, for “many” puts the lie to “outside the Church there is salvation”, while “all” makes room for all of Luther’s followers to argue for justification in faith alone or “sola fides” for salvation.
>
> Now “all” also ambiguously reaches out to the rest of the false religions of the world. Consequently, even the most egregious of all entries and the most heretical in the Catholic Catechism has credibility which states and implies unequivocally that “we are all believers in the same God” Islam and Judaism and Christians, so, therefore, we are all brothers and sisters.” Consider the following entries 841 & 842:
>
> (841) The Church’s relationship with Muslims: “The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.”
>
> (842) The Church’s bond with non-Christian religions is in the first place the common origin and end of the human race: All nations form but one community. This is so because all men stem from the one stock which God created to people the entire earth, and also because all share a common destiny, namely God. His providence, evident goodness, and saving designs extend to all against the day when the elect are gathered together in the holy city.
>
What folly, what heresy, what false teaching enters the hearts and souls of members of the one true Church by using "all" so ambiguously and wrongly, thus causing them to stop proselytizing “outside the Church there is no salvation.” Therefore, the Church with this heretical teaching of Vatican II and the New Mass have changed the reason why Christ truly died “for many” unto the remission of sins to the heretical “for all”.
>
> Now Satan’s trickery and the New Mass make it sound like Christ is more loving than even His Church which mistakenly taught for centuries and centuries “outside the Church there is no salvation”, but now in the New Church of the "Novus Ordo", the indefinable 'church of Christ', Christ inexplicably died “for all” making salvation more universal, generous, and egalitarian than Christ's own words. Why then, of course, “the Catholic Church subsists in the church of Christ,” making it no longer an asylum for the conversion and healing of sinners but now a more egalitarian one world church to which the most perverse and depraved of mankind in all their deviant wickedness against God's eternal Goodness and Commandments can also be benignly included.
>
> Consequently, the Church doors open to universal salvation, syncretism, world religion, and “outside the church there is salvation” as John Paul II demonstrated so scandalously at Assisi, Italy in 1988, praying together with all satanical religions and cults of the world as equals and not teaching them to pray only with the Church that alone gives salvation through Jesus Christ.
>
> Nevertheless, in spite of all this heretical teaching by Vatican II and the Counciliar popes, Pope Paul VI and John Paul II, we can be most thankful to St. Peter, the first apostle and first pope, for his true Catholic Orthodoxy in teaching this doctrine unambiguously, truthfully, and with clarity, right in Holy Scriptures itself that “outside the Church there is no salvation.” Many modernists will find this difficult to believe who now have seized control of the Church since the revolution of Vatican II and the “Novus Ordo Missae” from its very top in Rome to the pews inside the local Church, but nevertheless, here is the Great St. Peter’s teaching of this most crucial of all doctrines, right in Sacred Scriptures, by the rock of Peter Himself:
>
“Be you also as stones built up, a spiritual house, a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God by Jesus Christ. Wherefore it is said in the scripture: ‘Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious. And he that shall believe in Him shall not be confounded.’ ” (1Peter 2: 4-5)
>
> The very head of the Church at its very inception, the first pope, makes clear that this doctrine is everlasting in the economy of Salvation in such a beautiful metaphor, for without being part of the ‘spiritual house’, the Church, one cannot offer acceptable sacrifice to God, nor can one save his soul for he will inevitably be “confounded.”
>
> So precious, so sacred is the priesthood within the Church, says St. Peter, that all the time it must be ‘holy’ and the sacrifices it offers up to God must likewise be ‘spiritual.’ If the victim is not Jesus Christ then the sacrifice cannot be ‘spiritual’ nor is it possible for the priesthood, therefore, to be ‘holy’. To say or imply in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass that Christ died for “all” then the sacrifice is neither ‘spiritual’ nor the priesthood ‘holy’ nor the Victim JesusChrist. Not ‘spiritual’ because the implication is everyone shall be saved, and not ‘holy’ because the victim cannot, not be Jesus Christ, for the words and the teachings are not His. Thus the validity, too, of such masses becomes grievously 'suspect.'
>
> Furthermore, it is not spiritual, because to say everyone shall be saved or imply it, means no effort is necessary for salvation and so, in spite of our works, no sacrifice is necessary, no effort, no virtue, no holiness is required on man’s part because Redemption becomes simply a free gift to all from God and really His Son did not have to die because God is bestowing this gift on mankind in spite of His Son’s Passion and Death.
> Lest one thinks this is some false supposition amongst orthodox Catholics in the hierarchy or laity and not the true reality of this most heretical aberration in Church teaching and the liturgy, consider this entry in the Catechism of the Catholic Church entry #847:
>
Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience–those too may achieve eternal salvation.
>
To teach that salvation is possible if one is only "sincere" in his beliefs outside the Church, or that one simply fails to come in contact with a missionary of the Catholic Church or that one "ever came to doubt" his false teaching or beliefs makes a mockery of God’s sufficiency of grace for salvation for every soul, defies the perennial magisterium of the centuries and is consummate heresy on the part of Lumen Gentium from Vatican II in denying "outside the Church there is no salvation." This is true because so-called invincible ignorance, if this is what one who is sincerely ignorant of the faith possesses, only forgives one's soul of the sin of heresy but still he needs the necessary graces for salvation that only the Catholic Church provides and guarantees for physical members alone. Consequently, we see the utter importance of Our Lord’s command, in spite of all else, to go forth, therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost, and those who are baptized shall be saved; those who are not shall be condemned.
>
> In the economy of salvation, God has demanded absolutely from His Church certain things, one of which is–no exceptions–to baptize all in the Name of the Trinity, the very essence of our Catholic faith. And this Baptism must include the pouring of water and the proper sign of the cross with a total willingness to be baptized on the part of the catechumen. This is the undeniable teaching of Trent with no exceptions of so-called Baptism of Desire or Baptism of Blood as liberals like to claim with Vatican II. When Trent speaks of “desire” and baptism, it means the person’s 'willingness' to be baptized not a free-for-all Baptism of Desire or Blood as fallacious Vatican II Catechisms and documents try to maintain. As for the heresy of the Catholic Church having three Baptisms, including Baptisms of Blood and Desire, the Council of Florence solemnly defined that "no baptism of blood exists for "even if one pours out his blood for Jesus Christ, if he is not within the "bosom and unity" of the Church before death, it is of no avail." Finally, St. John condemns any baptism of blood or of man's 'willing' or desiring, for he states in the Last Gospel of every "Missa Latina Tridentina that "for those who believe in Him, they are born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God." Is it any wonder that the Last Gospel was eliminated by Paul VI' for the "Novus Ordo Missae?"
To demonstrate the mounting crisis of evangelization in the Church from all of this, consider only the story of a relative who once asked a priest in the LA Diocese on how she ought to approach a friend who was not Catholic and her obligation concerning the "Great Command," and the modernist priest blithely quipped; “Oh we don’t do that anymore!”
>
>
>
> Heresy and the Papacy
>
> III
>
>
>
> All of this leads to the ultimate question of whether Vatican II, with its documents and the New Mass of Paul VI is truly heretical. The answer is unequivocally affirmative in the following respects. First, when Pius IX made an exception to Eugene IV's Council of Florence Boniface, he opened the door to the latent modernist heresy of ecumenism by diminishing the solid teaching of “outside the Church there is no salvation”, when he said someone ‘in good faith’ can also be saved such as pagans, Protestants, Jews, or Islamists if they are ‘invincibly ignorant’ and believe the truth. Invincible Ignorance simply does not save one’s soul but only forgives one of the sin of heresy, as Thomas Aquinas states emphatically.
>
> The whole question of how anyone can be “in good faith” and yet rejects Christ’s Church and still can be saved, not only diminishes God’s command by Pope Eugene IV who initiated this doctrinal truth “outside the Church there is no salvation” at the Council of Florence in the 15th century but also challenges the logic of human reason in light of the sufficiency of God’s Almighty grace to everyman for his salvation. Herein lies the “diabolic disorientation” of Vatican Council II from the modernism of the Conciliar Bishops and Cardinals own tinkering with eternal truth and God’s absolute "Great Command" to go therefore and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit; those who are baptized will be saved and those who are not will e condemned."
>
> This diminishing of truth is latent heresy always: wherever it is done, however it is done, or wherever it is done or countenanced by Pope, Bishops, Cardinals or Priests, Catechists or whoever teaches the Roman Catholic Faith of the ages. Let us only consider Our Divine Teacher’s own words on this:
>
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not one letter, not one stroke of a letter, will pass from the law until all is accomplished.” (Matt 5: 17-18.)
>
Pope Paul VI especially countenanced this aberration of Christ’s "Great Command" and, moreover, still allowed this deception of Vatican II along with "Lumen Gentium" to go forth to the flock and forthwith scatter the sheep after the Council. Consider his own personally written document of Vatican II–“Nostra Aetate”, a document riddled with contradictions, half-truths, and mindless alternatives to “outside the Church there is no salvation.”
>
> We must realize here that even if it were true that of one could be ‘invincibly ignorant’ and that those who are unbaptized or those in heresy like Protestants or schismatics are still, nevertheless, not truly bodily members of the Church whether they are ‘invincibly ignorant’ or not and must still “work out their eternal salvation in fear and trembling” as St. Paul states. Therefore, the apartness from the vine, even though a seeming good branch at first observation, still lacks the sanctifying graces of total and complete Church unity from the Mass, the Sacraments, Penance and the Eucharist for salvation because of not full attachment to the Vine, a diminishment that will eventually cause the branch to wither, be jettisoned, and inevitably die. These words are the words of the Divine Word Himself in Holy Scripture and how we must be attached to the vine.
>
> One cannot be united "in faith" with Holy Mother Church and not "in prayer." The final word on unity in baptism, not two baptisms or three baptisms but one baptism in the Holy Catholic Church, is to be found in Christ Himself who was baptized by St. John the Baptist with water and the Holy Spirit Who came down upon Him in what was a Triune Sign of the Cross with the Heavenly Father. If Christ Who needed no baptism was baptized Himself in such humility as the perfect example to us, then all who shall enter His kingdom must likewise be so baptized. There is absolutely no extra-sacramental baptism of the Catholic Church, when Christ Our Lord used the sacraments Himself as the ultimate way, truth, and life of our faith and salvation.
>
> Heresy is heresy; however the difference between formal and material heresies cannot be ignored in Paul VI and the Council’s case with “Lumen Gentium” in general and “Nostra Aetate” by Paul VI in particular.
>
> Look at the fruits, look at the wreckage of the Church and the loss of millions of souls in the last forty years from this heretical teaching and practice, which was unmistakably latent and covert, nevertheless propagated and vigorously advocated by Paul VI, Vatican II and the Conciliar popes. While Paul VI did not teach ‘ex cathedra’ that “outside the Church there is salvation” officially , which would have made him a formal heretic, nonetheless, his weakness and pusillanimous leadership and vision to eradicate this atrocity of Vatican II makes him and the Council Fathers at least material heretics. God save us by the firm hand and teaching hand of Pope Benedict XVI and the Tridentine Mass to correct forever this covert heresy that still decimates the most Holy Catholic Church.
Benedict XVI, a most faithful shepherd and servant of the Lord, who has demanded that this aberration of "all are saved" be altered to "many are saved" is ignored to this very day by hundreds and thousands of his own bishops and priests, a scandal of scandals. Let us conclude with our Lord's Words on the supernatural fate of such scandalous behaviors:
"The Son of man shall send his angels, and they shall gather out of His kingdom all scandals, and them that work iniquity. And shall
cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. (Matt 13 41-42)
–To be continued–
> J Hughes Dunphy
|
